Calculation Of Input Tax Credit And Income Tax Payable

“Section 4-15 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997” states that in order to calculate taxable income, the allowable expenses are deducted from assessable income. In addition, a taxpayer is allowed in claiming deduction under “Section 8-1(1) of the ITAA 1997” for expenditures incurred on gaining or developing assessable income along with conducting the activities associated with the businesses. Hence, the following points are discussed briefly as follows:

• According to “Section 8-1”, the amount spent on moving a machinery would be taken into account for deduction only, if the machinery is utilised in earning an income, which is taxable. In case of “Granite Supply Association Ltd v Kitton(1905) and Smith v Westinghouse Brake Company (1888)”, the sum of money incurred for relocating expenses and plant would not be allowed as deduction due to the capital nature of the expenditures.
• “Section 8-1 of ITAA 1997” denotes that the cost of revaluation related to an asset is not considered as deductible expense.
• “Section 8-1 of ITAA 1997” represents that any expenditure related to lawful suits is suffered in contrast to the closure of the company and this would be taken into account in the form of deductible expenditure.
• As laid out in “Section 8-1 of ITAA 1997”, in order to assure business income, with prior experience of solicitor expense, it would be considered in the form of permissible deduction.

If a business organisation makes any purchase, the input credit of GST is permitted only, in case; pertinent documents are stored properly in association with such transactions. According to “GST Act 1999”, any organisation intending to make business income possesses the right to obtain credit of input for payments related to GST involving material or asset purchase.

It has been identified from the provided case that Big Bank Limited has incurred advertisement expenditure of $1,650,000 that includes GST as well. In the current scenario, the bank intends to assure that the overall expenditures related to advertisement would be permitted as credit of input or not, as the expenditures include GST.

As identified from the “Chapter 2 of the Goods and Services Act 1999”, input tax credit including GST would be permitted to an organisation on the incurred expenditures at the time of general course of the business. However, it is to be noted that such expenses include the amount of GST.

Big Bank Limited is a financial organisation that provides services to the individuals having more than 50 branches throughout the province of Australia. It has a 10-storied apartment, in which its head office is situated. Along with, there has been the introduction of home content and insurance policy in Australian market coupled with loan and deposit provisions of the customers over the years. In order to carry out advertising work, the bank has kept apart a budget amounting to $1,650,000 from which $550,000 is invested for house advertisement and insurance products. With the help of such investment, the organisation has managed to generate 2% of its overall revenues. The leftover amount of $1,100,000 is for promoting the other services of the organisation and it takes into consideration the GST as well.

Therefore, it has been evaluated that $1,100,000 had been incurred for the promotion of services for generation of maximum revenue, while the amount of $550,000 is to be considered as capital expense. This is because the newly launched product would contribute towards the income generation of the organisation.

Conclusion:

From the above discussion, it is inherent that the sum of $1,100,000 that the organisation has spent on advertising its current products and services would be allowed to obtain credit input. On the contrary, the overall amount of $550,000 would not be restricted to obtain credit of input, since 2% of such expense contributes towards the generation of income of Big Bank Limited.

 Table 1: Computation of input tax credit allowed to Big Bank Limited

(Source: As created by author)

The subdivision 717A concentrates on rules pertaining to the offset of income tax. The computation is provided as follows:

 Table 2: Computation of income tax payable

(Source: As created by author)

Along with the above-depicted table, the following computation is presented as follows:

 Table 3: Computation of income tax payable

(Source: As created by author)

 Table 3: Computation of income tax payable

(Source: As created by author)

The offset of foreign tax is computed by subtracting the amount of income tax payable under the first alternative from income tax payable from the second alternative. Henceforth, the limit is computed as $4,972.50 ($11,794.18 - $6,821.68). It could be observed that the sum of offset of foreign tax is greater in contrast to the payment of foreign tax. Hence, the offset limit of foreign tax is $4,400.

 Table 5: Computation of net profit from partnership

(Source: As created by author)

References:

Caldwell, R, Taxation for Australian businesses. in .

Kenny, P, Australian tax 2013. in , Chatswood, N.S.W., LexisNexis Butterworths, 2013.

Krever, R, Australian taxation law cases 2013. in , Pyrmont, N.S.W., Thomson Reuters, 2013.

Morgan, A, C Mortimer, & D Pinto, A practical introduction to Australian taxation law. in . 2016.

Morgan, A, C Mortimer, & D Pinto, A practical introduction to Australian taxation law. in , North Ryde [N.S.W.], CCH Australia, 2013.

Woellner, R, R Woellner, S Barkoczy, S Murphy, C Evans, & D Pinto, Australian Taxation Law 2015. in .

Woellner, R, S Barkoczy, S Murphy, C Evans, & D Pinto, Australian taxation law select 2014. in .

Woellner, R, Australian taxation law 2012. in , North Ryde [N.S.W.], CCH Australia, 2013.

Woellner, R, Australian taxation law select 2013. in , North Ryde, N.S.W., CCH Australia, 2013.